搜索结果: 1-15 共查到“哲学 reply”相关记录18条 . 查询时间(0.627 秒)
The Rationalist Reply to Fodor's Analyticity and Circularity Challenge
analyticity theoretical circularity Rationalist IRS Complete Frege Test analiticidad circularidad teórica SPI Racionalista Test de Frege Completo
2016/6/15
The central Fodorian objections to Inferential Role Semantics (IRS) can be taken to include an ‘Analyticity Challenge’ and a ‘Circularity Challenge’, which are ultimately challenges to IRS explanation...
The Role of Psychological Harm in Delusions:a reply to Graham
Delusions Harm Values Philosophy of Psychiatry
2016/6/15
In recent work George Graham (2010) develops and defends a realist account of mental disorders, along the way offering a challenge to the "standard view" of delusions. He begins with a symptom-focused...
Reply to Fleming
time quantum events persistence POVMs
2016/6/15
In this reply to Prof. Fleming's response (http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9695/) to my `Time and Quantum Theory: A History and A Prospectus' (http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9995/) I take issue with ...
Unsharp Humean Chances in Statistical Physics:A Reply to Beisbart
Best System Analysis Chance Unsharp Probability Statistical Mechanics
2016/6/13
In an illuminating article, Claus Beisbart argues that the recently-popular thesis that the probabilities of statistical mechanics (SM) are Best System chances runs into a serious obstacle: there is n...
Reply to Gao’s “Comment on”How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements”
Quantum mechanics wave function protective measurement Gao
2016/5/31
Shan Gao (Gao 2011) recently presented a critical reconsideration of a paper I wote (Uffink 1999) on the subject of protective measurement. Here, I take the occasion to reply to his objections.
The Scaling of Speeds and Distances in Galileo’s Two New Sciences:A reply to Palmerino and Laird
Galileo history physics freefall
2016/5/30
In this reply, we respond to the comments of Palmerino and Laird on our article, "Galileo's Refutation of the Speed Distance Law of Fall Rehabilitated," published in the same issue of Centaurus.
In a recent paper Savas Tsohatzidis has provided a number of putative counterexamples to the well-attested Kartunnen-Vendler (K-V) thesis that the use of 'tell' with a wh-complement requires that the ...
Historical Context and Philosophy of Science: Reply to Peter Simons' 'Coincidence and Kite-Flying'
Wittgenstein physical similarity physically similar systems Tractatus
2009/4/20
This essay responds to a review of my book Wittgenstein Flies A Kite: A Story of Models of Wings and Models of the World by Peter Simons that appears in the March 2009 issue of the journal Metascience...
A Reply to Puolakka
Reply Puolakka
2008/11/7
From what I understand, the author agrees that the concerns I raise in my paper are to be reckoned with; however, he thinks that Danto's latest work can accommodate them and, therefore, my critical st...
Multiple Inheritance and Film Identity: A Reply to Dilworth
film ontology of film types tokens
2008/11/6
I argue that Dilworth has not shown the type / token theory of film identity to be non-viable, since there is no reason to think that a single object cannot be a token of two types. Even if we assume...
The Special and General Theory of Realism: Reply to Abell, Armstrong, and McMahon
Realism General Theory
2008/11/6
Conceptions of pictorial realism abound, and perhaps only a philosopher would fret over such abundance as is to be found in this symposium. Saying that Abell, Armstrong, and McMahon offer us three acc...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of his philosophy of quantum theory, it is difficult to find a clear statement of the reply's philosop...
Special Relativity, Coexistence and Temporal Parts: A Reply to Gilmore
special relativity coexistence temporal parts
2008/4/21
In two earlier works (Balashov, 2000a and 2000b), I have argued that considerations based on special relativity and the notion of coexistence favor the perdurance view of persistence over its enduranc...
This is my commentary on Jonathan Schaffer's paper "Evidence for Fundamentality?”; both the paper and comments were presented at the Pacific APA, San Francisco, March 2001.
Schaffer argues against...
In this article I critique Kathleen Slaney and Michael Maraun’s (2005) addition to the ongoing philosophical charge that neuroscientific writing often transgresses the bounds of sense. While they some...