搜索结果: 1-12 共查到“科学技术哲学 reply”相关记录12条 . 查询时间(0.031 秒)
Reply to Fleming
time quantum events persistence POVMs
2016/6/15
In this reply to Prof. Fleming's response (http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9695/) to my `Time and Quantum Theory: A History and A Prospectus' (http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9995/) I take issue with ...
Unsharp Humean Chances in Statistical Physics:A Reply to Beisbart
Best System Analysis Chance Unsharp Probability Statistical Mechanics
2016/6/13
In an illuminating article, Claus Beisbart argues that the recently-popular thesis that the probabilities of statistical mechanics (SM) are Best System chances runs into a serious obstacle: there is n...
Reply to Gao’s “Comment on”How to protect the interpretation of the wave function against protective measurements”
Quantum mechanics wave function protective measurement Gao
2016/5/31
Shan Gao (Gao 2011) recently presented a critical reconsideration of a paper I wote (Uffink 1999) on the subject of protective measurement. Here, I take the occasion to reply to his objections.
The Scaling of Speeds and Distances in Galileo’s Two New Sciences:A reply to Palmerino and Laird
Galileo history physics freefall
2016/5/30
In this reply, we respond to the comments of Palmerino and Laird on our article, "Galileo's Refutation of the Speed Distance Law of Fall Rehabilitated," published in the same issue of Centaurus.
Historical Context and Philosophy of Science: Reply to Peter Simons' 'Coincidence and Kite-Flying'
Wittgenstein physical similarity physically similar systems Tractatus
2009/4/20
This essay responds to a review of my book Wittgenstein Flies A Kite: A Story of Models of Wings and Models of the World by Peter Simons that appears in the March 2009 issue of the journal Metascience...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of his philosophy of quantum theory, it is difficult to find a clear statement of the reply's philosop...
Special Relativity, Coexistence and Temporal Parts: A Reply to Gilmore
special relativity coexistence temporal parts
2008/4/21
In two earlier works (Balashov, 2000a and 2000b), I have argued that considerations based on special relativity and the notion of coexistence favor the perdurance view of persistence over its enduranc...
This is my commentary on Jonathan Schaffer's paper "Evidence for Fundamentality?”; both the paper and comments were presented at the Pacific APA, San Francisco, March 2001.
Schaffer argues against...
In this article I critique Kathleen Slaney and Michael Maraun’s (2005) addition to the ongoing philosophical charge that neuroscientific writing often transgresses the bounds of sense. While they some...
David Malament and the Conventionality of Simultaneity: A Reply
Grunbaum's Reply to Malament metrical simultaneity
2008/4/11
In 1977, David Malament proved the valuable technical result that the simultaneity relation of standard synchrony with respect to an inertial observer O is uniquely definable in terms of the relation ...
Anthropic Reasoning and the Contemporary Design Argument in Astrophysics: A Reply to Robert Klee
philosophy of cosmology observation selection
2008/4/10
In a recent study of astrophysical “fine-tunings” (or “coincidences”), Robert Klee critically assesses the support that such astrophysical evidence might be thought to lend to the design argument (i.e...
A thirder and an Everettian: a reply to Lewis's 'Quantum Sleeping Beauty'
an Everettian A thirder
2008/4/9
Since the publication of Elga’s seminal paper in 2000, the Sleeping Beauty paradox has been the source
of much discussion, particularly in this journal. Over the past few decades the Everettian inter...